Developed By: Myself Technology: PostgreSQL, JSP Website: http://www.getintocollege.com Note: Tasked with modifying the cms and adding new sections to the website.
Note: We were tasked with creating a site that would pull in content from a&g blog, Flickr, and YouTube allowing seamless cross linking between the different sections and do it all 4 weeks. This meant writing a middle layer communications api that would query the wordpress database(standard feed from wordpress were not sufficient), Flickr and YouTube that would return simple formatted XML to be used by Flash. Content Association was done by using common naming scheme for tags accross all frameworks. This design choice gave us a decentralized way of managing content.
Allen & Gerritsen
As you view the video below remember that videos are streamed from YouTube and Images are streamed from Flickr
When you come to think of it web2.0 was about rich Internet applications, using platforms like Ajax. Flash and Siverlight. rich in the sense that they could function and animate as well as desktop applications. But web2.0 didn’t necessarily mean that you had a rich user experience. An example is Facebook here is a nice web2.0 application but it still lacked user experience, it was somewhat cumbersome in how I interact with parts of the web site( or web application).
Rich User Experience is what keeps the user engage. Engaging the user and keeping them engaged is a complex thing to so. Giving In you face content or the BAM! factor will cause some people to engage but not all users will respond the same way. I don’t believe that Rich User Experience has to always be something that is flashy or slick, It measured by the user time on your web site plus the re visiting of the user.
I believe that one can achieve this by building intelligent sites that offer a passive guidance to the user as he/she navigates the web site. Amazon has been doing this for years and are a good example. How good is a web site that I don’t engage with frequently.
